<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed up Mail.app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/</link>
	<description>Purveyors of self-important ramblings and half-baked theories since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bastin</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-812</guid>
		<description>After doing the re-install and house cleaning, everything seems to be in place. Looking back, it&#039;s possible I wasn&#039;t looking where I thought I was looking. Anyway, now I did do the &quot;vacuum&quot; operation and was able to take an 11MB Envelope Index down to about 8.5MB.

The effect? Not really noticeable. My mail didn&#039;t seem slow before, and I don&#039;t notice any change. Of course, my Envelope Index didn&#039;t seem nearly as large as some I&#039;ve read about in this thread and others. But I keep very little mail in my Inbox, it all gets filtered off to other folders as soon as it arrives. Maybe this has an effect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After doing the re-install and house cleaning, everything seems to be in place. Looking back, it&#8217;s possible I wasn&#8217;t looking where I thought I was looking. Anyway, now I did do the &#8220;vacuum&#8221; operation and was able to take an 11MB Envelope Index down to about 8.5MB.</p>
<p>The effect? Not really noticeable. My mail didn&#8217;t seem slow before, and I don&#8217;t notice any change. Of course, my Envelope Index didn&#8217;t seem nearly as large as some I&#8217;ve read about in this thread and others. But I keep very little mail in my Inbox, it all gets filtered off to other folders as soon as it arrives. Maybe this has an effect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richa</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Richa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Right, just wanted to make sure. Just to remove any complicating factors, I created a new POP account for a new user on a machine that had a fresh Leopard install (rather than my other laptop, which had been upgraded from Tiger). &lt;code&gt;Envelope Index&lt;/code&gt; was in &lt;code&gt;~/Library/Mail&lt;/code&gt; for me. Yes, do let me know if you see a difference after you run your update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, just wanted to make sure. Just to remove any complicating factors, I created a new POP account for a new user on a machine that had a fresh Leopard install (rather than my other laptop, which had been upgraded from Tiger). <code>Envelope Index</code> was in <code>~/Library/Mail</code> for me. Yes, do let me know if you see a difference after you run your update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bastin</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Never mind. I&#039;m now re-installing a Combo Update for another problem; let me see what develops on that before I come back to his issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind. I&#8217;m now re-installing a Combo Update for another problem; let me see what develops on that before I come back to his issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bastin</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-809</guid>
		<description>What I said in my message was:

&quot;I did a cd to ~/Library/Mail &quot;

That&#039;s the Mail folder in my home directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I said in my message was:</p>
<p>&#8220;I did a cd to ~/Library/Mail &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the Mail folder in my home directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richa</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Richa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Are you sure you&#039;re looking in &lt;code&gt;~/Library/Mail&lt;/code&gt;? That&#039;s the Library folder in your home directory, not at the root of the filesystem; &lt;code&gt;/Users/yourname/Library/Mail&lt;/code&gt;, not &lt;code&gt;/Library/Mail&lt;/code&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure you&#8217;re looking in <code>~/Library/Mail</code>? That&#8217;s the Library folder in your home directory, not at the root of the filesystem; <code>/Users/yourname/Library/Mail</code>, not <code>/Library/Mail</code>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bastin</title>
		<link>http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin/2009/07/06/speed-up-mail-app/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richa.avasthi.name/blogs/tepumpkin.old/?p=1408#comment-807</guid>
		<description>I took a look at this when I saw this current reference to it (I had read the original posts, but since they were a couple of years old, I didn&#039;t think things would still be the same).

I did a cd to ~/Library/Mail and there was no Envelope Index to be found. I did a locate for Envelope Index and the only one I found was in a Mail folder in the backup of my office PowerMac G5 that I keep on my laptop.

I&#039;m running Mail 3.6 (935/935.3) in Mac OS X 10.5.7. There are three POP accounts.

Any thoughts?

John Bastin
bastinj@gmail.com

MacBook Pro 2.4GHz (17-inch)
4 GB RAM
320GB HDD
Mac OS X 10.5.7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at this when I saw this current reference to it (I had read the original posts, but since they were a couple of years old, I didn&#8217;t think things would still be the same).</p>
<p>I did a cd to ~/Library/Mail and there was no Envelope Index to be found. I did a locate for Envelope Index and the only one I found was in a Mail folder in the backup of my office PowerMac G5 that I keep on my laptop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running Mail 3.6 (935/935.3) in Mac OS X 10.5.7. There are three POP accounts.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
<p>John Bastin<br />
<a href="mailto:bastinj@gmail.com">bastinj@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>MacBook Pro 2.4GHz (17-inch)<br />
4 GB RAM<br />
320GB HDD<br />
Mac OS X 10.5.7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 266/266 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: assets.avasthi.name

Served from: richa.avasthi.name @ 2012-02-11 03:40:22 -->
